Identify data related to the population affected. Analyze the data by comparing/contrasting data at the institution level, national, state, and/or local levels.

Psychotropic Monthly Intramuscular Injections

Description

The final paper will demonstrate your systematic approach to change and ability to negotiate evidence-based improvements to care. You may incorporate previous assignments from this course to complete your final paper.

Include the following in your paper (see rubric):

Define the problem.

Analyze, compare/contrast data at the institution level, and national, state, and/or local levels.

Present best practices to solve the problem (include stakeholders/decision makers within your institution/practice). Have they proposed a solution?

Evaluate factors related to the problem: 1) Financial; 2) Education/Information; 3) Organizational infrastructure; 4) Collaboration with others in the community or other organizations; 5) Policies that facilitate/constrain change (institutional, state/federal laws or regulations).

following five criteria and comment on all points (a,b,c, d, e…):

Population Benefit: a) Quality of life; b) Outcomes of care; c) Consistent with evidence-based standards; d) Access improved for a specified population; e) Health disparities decreased

Describe your rationale for your choice amongst the alternative solutions.

Present your strategy: Assume you will debate your strategy with a committee or board of directors. Appendix C in Shell’s text will help you complete this part of the paper.

Criteria

Define the problem. Explain the specific nature of the problem. Who is affected? What is causing the problem? 20 points

Synthesize sources of evidence and present the background.

Identify data related to the population affected. Analyze the data by comparing/contrasting data at the institution level, national, state, and/or local levels.

30 points

Present best practices related to the problem. Do you know the stakeholders/decision makers stance on the problem (within your institution/practice)? Have they a proposed solution?

Evaluate the below content related to the problem:

1) Financial

2) Education / Information

3) Organizational infrastructure

4) Collaboration with others in the community or other organizations

5) Policies that facilitate/constrain change (institutional, state/federal laws or regulations).

30 points

Following five criteria and comment on all points (a,b,c, etc.) to present an alternative proposal/solution:

1) Population Benefit:

a) Quality of life

b) Outcomes of care

c) Consistent with evidence-based standards

d) Access improved for a specified population

e) Health disparities decreased

35 points

Identify your decision-making process: How will you share/govern the decision-making groups/process (i.e., experts/consultants, pilot program/study – explain)?

Describe how you will choose amongst alternative solutions.

25 points

Present your implementation strategy:

Assume that you will debate your alternative/solutions to a legislative group. Cite required this approach i.e., see Appendix C in Shell’s text to help you in this part of the paper.

25 points

Powerpoint draft is attached

Reference list is attached

articles are attached