Write: Describe how you arrived at your solutions. Showcase your critical thinking skills and include supporting detail to back up your conclusions.

Words: 298
Pages: 2
Subject: Mathematics

P . If the price needs to be adjusted let me know.

Bennett, J. O., & Briggs, W. L. (2019). Using and understanding mathematics: A quantitative reasoning approach (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

When gathering investment data, etc look at sources such as Vanguard 500 index, Dow Jones Industrial Average, etc.

Prior to beginning work on this discussion, read Chapter 4: Managing Money.

Your instructor will assign you a number. Complete the problem based on the number assigned to you by your instructor; be sure to address all the questions that are asked. Then, respond to at least three different peers.

Write: Describe how you arrived at your solutions. Showcase your critical thinking skills and include supporting detail to back up your conclusions.

Your initial post should be at least 250 words in length. It should show all the required math work and explain all the steps. Also, include a simple reference for any used resource. For example: Washington Post dated August 13, 2018 or retrieved from .
Your initial discussion thread is due on Day 4 (Friday), and you have until Day 7 (Monday) to respond to your classmates. Your grade will reflect both the quality of your initial post and the depth of your responses. Carefully review the Grading Rubric for guidance on how your discussion will be evaluated.

Question 10:

Choose three stocks, three bonds, and three mutual funds that you think would make good investments. Imagine that you invest $1,000 in each of these nine investments. Use an internet resource to track the value of your investment portfolio over the next five weeks. Based on the portfolio value at the end, find your return for the five-week period. Which investments did better, and which did worse?

Have they answered all the questions pertaining to their problem?
Have they used all the required resources and cited the references correctly?

Do you understand their answers and agree with their conclusions and viewpoints?
What are your arguments against their answers?