Does apply the test in Rights and Duties or Fairness and Justice lead you to a different answer?

Must post first.
How to Do Well in Discussions
• Make your initial post responding to the above questions by Saturday, and comment on at least four of your classmates’ posts by Tuesday. Posting late may lose you points.
• Respond to the specific questions posed in the discussion.
• Be sure to base your initial post and responses on course materials, and use 7th ed. APA citations in every post.
• Post your responses over three days and respond to four or more students to receive full credit for frequency of participation.
• Write clearly and proofread; errors can lose you points.
• Quality of posts, citations, frequency, and timeliness of posts all factor into your discussion grade. See the Participation Grading Rubric for details.
Instructions:
/content/enforced/663839-M_001154-01-2222/21-The-FBI-Apple-Security-vs.-Privacy.pdf

https://www-proquest-com.ezproxy.umgc.edu/news/docview/2333999028/6A9FCFA903A74355PQ

Apple and the FBI have two separate incidences where the FBI has asked Apple to break into an iPhone in a terrorist investigation where that phone may contain information that could prevent another terrorist attack. I have attached a case study that details the incident in 2015 and I have included a link to a New York Times article that details the incident earlier this year. For purposes of this discussion, you are Tim Cook and you must decide how to respond to the FBI’s latest request. Falling back on his business studies, Mr. Cook applies utilitarianism to analyze what his decision should be.
• Who are the stakeholders in this and how might they be affect by Apple’s decision?
• What decision benefits the greatest number of these stakeholders?
• Do you agree with the decision that utilitarianism leads you to? Why or why not?
• Does apply the test in Rights and Duties or Fairness and Justice lead you to a different answer?
You must start a thread before you can read and reply to other threads